First, it determines what the data can support
Data may come from a meter, CT, sub-meter or compatible equipment. Sampling rate, load type and sensor quality determine what can be detected and at what confidence.
Building B demo scenario · 15-minute intervals synthetic data for product explanation
KAP turns meter and sensor data into monitoring, alerts, analysis and practical reduction recommendations. Automated control is enabled only after site validation, compatible hardware and explicit authorization.
Abnormal base-load increase · operator review required
Lighting outside operating hours · suggested alert
Server cooling · load-shift recommendation prepared
This chart is a synthetic demonstration scenario created to explain the product workflow; it is not customer data or a performance claim.
DEMO SCENARIO · 21:00
This is a synthetic scenario. Lighting, cooling and standby loads remain visible after operating hours. KAP first establishes whether the pattern is expected, anomalous or simply missing operational context.
Keep scrolling
Decision simulation: real switching requires compatible equipment, safety logic and authorized approval.
Decision architecture
KAP checks data quality, estimates baselines and anomalies, and reports confidence. No estimate is presented as certain and no command is executed without authorization.
Data may come from a meter, CT, sub-meter or compatible equipment. Sampling rate, load type and sensor quality determine what can be detected and at what confidence.
Consumption history, operating schedules, weather and tariffs can enter the model. The analysis interval and forecast horizon are configured to the site data.
The current phase delivers reports, alerts and recommendations. Manual or automatic control is a later capability with compatible equipment, logging, override and fail-safe behavior.
Monitoring, baseline analysis, peak and anomaly alerts, reports and actionable recommendations without autonomous switching.
Connection to compatible meters, CTs or actuators; manual commands and supervised control after site-level safety validation.
Edge intelligence and conditional automation with fail-safe logic, audit trails, access control and manual override.
One engine, different operating realities
The analysis model and pilot scope are configured to the site. Choose a context:
KAP builds a baseline, flags persistent night consumption and turns recurring patterns into a reviewable recommendation. Device-level labels are shown only when confidence is sufficient.
Current delivery: monitoring, analysis and recommendations
A measurable pilot
These figures describe the proposed pilot structure, not achieved savings. Any reduction percentage is published only after a documented baseline, operating conditions and an agreed M&V method.
Technical notes
The complete path from sensing and data-quality checks to baselines, anomaly detection, confidence scoring and a recommendation an operator can review.
Detection quality depends on sampling rate, sensor quality, similar loads and simultaneous events. KAP reports confidence instead of presenting every estimate as a fact.
The pilot defines a baseline, operating conditions, exclusions and an M&V method before any reduction or payback claim is made.
Company
We are building KAP as a practical intelligence layer between electricity data and operational decisions. The goal is not another dashboard; it is a measurable, safe and gradually automatable process for reducing waste.
Start with one clear problem
No pre-set percentage promise; we review the data, baseline and constraints first.
Start with the site, not a sales pitch
Share the site type, operating hours, available meter or CT data and the main concern. The initial response will define the first measurement step and the limits to validate.